Brady v. Brady

203 A.D.2d 408, 610 N.Y.S.2d 853
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 408 (Brady v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brady v. Brady, 203 A.D.2d 408, 610 N.Y.S.2d 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action to rescind a conveyance of real property on the ground of fraud, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated April 28, 1992, which, upon reargument, vacated a prior order of the same court, dated February 18, 1992, and denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that triable questions of fact remain as to whether and under what circumstances the plaintiff signed the deed in question. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Lieu v. Pellegrini
256 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 408, 610 N.Y.S.2d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-brady-nyappdiv-1994.