Brady v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brady v. Brady

203 A.D.2d 408, 610 N.Y.S.2d 853

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 18, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to rescind a conveyance of real property on the ground of fraud, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated April 28, 1992, which, upon reargument, vacated a prior order of the same court, dated February 18, 1992, and denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that triable questions of fact remain as to whether and under what circumstances the plaintiff signed the deed in question. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to rescind a conveyance of real property on the ground of fraud, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated April 28, 1992, which, upon reargument, vacated a prior order of the same court, dated February 18, 1992, and denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that triable questions of fact remain as to whether and under what circumstances the plaintiff signed the deed in question. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Brady v. Brady, 203 A.D.2d 408, 610 N.Y.S.2d 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

203 A.D.2d 408 (Brady v. Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related