Van Keuren v. Okun Furniture Co.

38 Mass. App. Dec. 202
CourtMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
DecidedDecember 10, 1966
Docket#152404
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Mass. App. Dec. 202 (Van Keuren v. Okun Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Keuren v. Okun Furniture Co., 38 Mass. App. Dec. 202 (Mass. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Garvey, P.J.

The plaintiff, a minor, in this action of contract seeks to recover from the defendant seller payments he made on the purchase price of articles of furniture. The furniture consisted of a two piece sofa bed set; a chair recliner; two step tables and a cocktail table. After a trial there was a finding for the plaintiff and the defendant claimed a report.

The trial judge made the following findings of fact: “I find that the plaintiff when a minor and engaged to be married, paid $235.00 to the defendant in partial payment of a living room set of furniture. Upon the engagement being broken three weeks later, the plaintiff dis-affirmed the contract. I find he disaffirmed the contract within a reasonable time and that it was not a contract for necessaries.” There was no error, and there is no need of discussing the judge’s actions on the defendant’s requests for rulings of law.” Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc., 351 Mass. 703.

The report is to be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc.
221 N.E.2d 468 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Mass. App. Dec. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-keuren-v-okun-furniture-co-massdistctapp-1966.