Van Keuren v. Okun Furniture Co.

38 Mass. App. Dec. 202
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division·Decided December 10, 1966·No. #152404·Published

Opinion

Garvey, P.J.

The plaintiff, a minor, in this action of contract seeks to recover from the defendant seller payments he made on the purchase price of articles of furniture. The furniture consisted of a two piece sofa bed set; a chair recliner; two step tables and a cocktail table. After a trial there was a finding for the plaintiff and the defendant claimed a report.

The trial judge made the following findings of fact: “I find that the plaintiff when a minor and engaged to be married, paid $235.00 to the defendant in partial payment of a living room set of furniture. Upon the engagement being broken three weeks later, the plaintiff dis-affirmed the contract. I find he disaffirmed the contract within a reasonable time and that it was not a contract for necessaries.” There was no error, and there is no need of discussing the judge’s actions on the defendant’s requests for rulings of law.” Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc., 351 Mass. 703.

The report is to be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Keuren v. Okun Furniture Co., 38 Mass. App. Dec. 202 (Mass. Ct. App. 1966).

38 Mass. App. Dec. 202 (Van Keuren v. Okun Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc.
221 N.E.2d 468 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1966)