Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc.
This text of 221 N.E.2d 468 (Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action of contract the plaintiff, a minor, seeks to recover from the seller the purchase price of an automobile. The judge found for the plaintiff. We see no point in quoting the defendant’s requests for rulings or the judge’s rulings on these requests. There was no error. The fact that the plaintiff’s brother, who was over twenty-one years of age, was present and participated in the transaction does not remove the minor from the protection of the law if it is found that the minor was the sole purchaser of the vehicle. Frye v. Yasi, 327 Mass. 724. There was ample evidence to support such a finding.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 N.E.2d 468, 351 Mass. 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cadigan-v-strand-garage-inc-mass-1966.