Van Hoesen v. Gelfen
158 A. 343, 110 N.J. Eq. 69, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 782
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, and reported in 103 N. J. Eq. 234.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Hoesen v. Gelfen, 158 A. 343, 110 N.J. Eq. 69, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 782 (N.J. 1932).
158 A. 343 (Van Hoesen v. Gelfen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Langeveld v. L. R. Z. H. Corp.
376 A.2d 931 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. NJ BK. & TR.
250 A.2d 57 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Crane Co. v. James McHugh Sons, Inc.
108 F.2d 55 (Tenth Circuit, 1939)
Burack v. Mayers
187 A. 767 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Kelly v. Middlesex, C., Trust Co.
172 A. 487 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Mann v. Bugbee
167 A. 202 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)