Van Hoesen v. Gelfen

158 A. 343, 110 N.J. Eq. 69, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 782
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 1, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 158 A. 343 (Van Hoesen v. Gelfen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Hoesen v. Gelfen, 158 A. 343, 110 N.J. Eq. 69, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 782 (N.J. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, and reported in 103 N. J. Eq. 234.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langeveld v. L. R. Z. H. Corp.
376 A.2d 931 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. NJ BK. & TR.
250 A.2d 57 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Crane Co. v. James McHugh Sons, Inc.
108 F.2d 55 (Tenth Circuit, 1939)
Burack v. Mayers
187 A. 767 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Kelly v. Middlesex, C., Trust Co.
172 A. 487 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Mann v. Bugbee
167 A. 202 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A. 343, 110 N.J. Eq. 69, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-hoesen-v-gelfen-nj-1932.