Van Gundy Et Al. v. United States

Supreme Court

Van Gundy Et Al. v. United States

419 U.S. 1004, 95 S. Ct. 326

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 11, 1974

Docket73-1823

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 419 U.S. 1004 (Van Gundy Et Al. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Gundy Et Al. v. United States, 419 U.S. 1004, 95 S. Ct. 326 (1974).

Pincite

Opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, [1005]*100542-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, [1005]*100542-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 U.S. 1004, 95 S. Ct. 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-gundy-et-al-v-united-states-scotus-1974.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack