Van Eppes v. Comm'rs' Court of Mobile
This text of 25 Ala. 460 (Van Eppes v. Comm'rs' Court of Mobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The county can be charged only with such expenses as are authorized by law; and unless there is some statute which authorized the judge of the Circuit Court to direct the sheriff to provide carriages to convey the grand jurors to the jail, for the purpose of inspecting it, the expense thus incurred cannot be recovered out of the county. We have been cited to no statute, and have been able to find none, which makes it thus chargeable. The grand jurors receive a per diem compensation, which is supposed to be adequate, and which must be considered as extending to all the services required of them by law. That the Commissioners’ Court has .allowed such items for many years past, serves to show, perhaps, a commendable liberality, but does not fix upon the •county a liability where none otherwise exists by law.
[461]*461The amount in this case is quite small, it is true ; but to allow it would establish a precedent which might reach far beyond the case at bar, and tend to squander the public funds.
The Circuit Court did right in refusing to give judgment for it, and its judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Ala. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-eppes-v-commrs-court-of-mobile-ala-1854.