Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes
This text of 948 A.2d 1285 (Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond VAN DUREN, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Leigh E. RZASA-ORMES, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant (Gibbons, Newark and Schepisi & McLaughlin, Englewood Cliffs, attorneys; Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, Newark, John A. Schepisi, Englewood Cliffs and Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs).
Steven R. Klein, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys; Mr. Klein and Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs).
David G. Evans, Pittstown, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 394 N.J.Super. 254, 926 A.2d 372 (2007).
For affirmanceChief Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and HOENS7.
OpposedNone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
948 A.2d 1285, 195 N.J. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-duren-v-rzasa-ormes-nj-2008.