Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes

948 A.2d 1285, 195 N.J. 230
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 19, 2008
DocketA-52 September Term, 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 948 A.2d 1285 (Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes, 948 A.2d 1285, 195 N.J. 230 (N.J. 2008).

Opinion

948 A.2d 1285 (2008)
195 N.J. 230

Raymond VAN DUREN, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Leigh E. RZASA-ORMES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. A-52 September Term, 2007

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 25, 2008.
Decided June 19, 2008.

Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant (Gibbons, Newark and Schepisi & McLaughlin, Englewood Cliffs, attorneys; Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, Newark, John A. Schepisi, Englewood Cliffs and Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs).

Steven R. Klein, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys; Mr. Klein and Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs).

David G. Evans, Pittstown, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 394 N.J.Super. 254, 926 A.2d 372 (2007).

For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and HOENS—7.

Opposed—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes
926 A.2d 372 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes
948 A.2d 1285 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
948 A.2d 1285, 195 N.J. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-duren-v-rzasa-ormes-nj-2008.