Van Bergen v. Van Bergen
2 Johns. Ch. 272, 1816 N.Y. LEXIS 206, 1816 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3
Opinion
I have no doubt of the jurisdiction cases private can them to be abated, as well as restrain them from being erected. (Coulson v. White, 3 Atk. 21. East India Co. v. Vincent, 2 Atk. 83.) But this is not to be done until the opposite party has been heard. Lord Hardwicke said, in the case of Ryder v. Bentham, (1 Vesey, 543.) that the Court never makes an order, on motion, to pull down any thing, though it will, sometimes, on motion,' order a thing going on to be stayed.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Bergen v. Van Bergen, 2 Johns. Ch. 272, 1816 N.Y. LEXIS 206, 1816 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3 (N.Y. 1816).
2 Johns. Ch. 272 (Van Bergen v. Van Bergen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Sanford v. Ashton
179 So. 765 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Carmichael v. City of Texarkana
94 F. 561 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas, 1899)
Fisher v. Rankin
25 Abb. N. Cas. 191 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Ronayne v. Loranger
33 N.W. 840 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1887)
Coker v. Dawkins
20 Fla. 141 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1883)
Lamar v. Railroad Co.
10 S.C. 476 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1879)
Earl v. De Hart
12 N.J. Eq. 280 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1856)
Winnipissiogee Lake Co. v. Worster
29 N.H. 433 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1854)
Smith v. Olmstead
5 Blackf. 37 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1838)