Van Alstyne v. Town of Coxsackie
20 A.D.2d 747, 247 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4321
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1964·Published
Opinion
Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting permission for late filing. (See Matter of Hogan v. City of Cohoes, 279 App. Div. 282; Matter of Biancoviso v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 320; Matter of Osborn v. Board of Educ., 5 A D 2d 929; Galerneau v. North Colonie Cent. School Dist., 7 A D 2d 693; Matter of Pandoliano v. New York City Tr. Auth., 17 A D 2d 951; Matter of Rosenburg v. City of New York, 309 N. Y, 304.) Order affirmed, with $10 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Alstyne v. Town of Coxsackie, 20 A.D.2d 747, 247 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
20 A.D.2d 747 (Van Alstyne v. Town of Coxsackie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hogan v. City of Cohoes
279 A.D. 282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Biancoviso v. City of New York
285 A.D. 320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)