Valiante v. Allstate Insurance Co.

462 So. 2d 590, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 253
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 1985
Docket84-2378
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 462 So. 2d 590 (Valiante v. Allstate Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valiante v. Allstate Insurance Co., 462 So. 2d 590, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 253 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

462 So.2d 590 (1985)

Salvatore Joseph VALIANTE, Petitioner,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Respondent.

No. 84-2378.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 23, 1985.

C. Samuel Newman of L.D. Beltz & Associates, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

Gregory W. Hootman and Claire L. Hamner of Dickinson, O'Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Sarasota, for respondent.

OTT, Acting Chief Judge.

In this petition for writ of certiorari, the petitioner, Valiante, asks this court to quash an order of the lower court striking his request for a jury trial in an action for declaratory judgment. We grant the petition. See Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Valiante filed a complaint against Allstate seeking a declaratory judgment as to his rights and duties under a certain contract of personal injury protection insurance. Valiante further seeks payment of benefits pursuant to the contract. The complaint sets forth issues of law and fact. The lower court granted Allstate's motion to strike Valiante's demand for a jury trial.

Allstate now concedes that under section 86.071, Florida Statutes (1983), Valiante has a right to a jury trial on the factual issues should the legal questions presented in his complaint be decided in Valiante's favor. See F.R.W.P., Inc. v. Home Insurance Co., 450 So.2d 914 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). See also Olin's Inc. v. Avis Rental Car System of Florida, 131 So.2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).

We agree and, therefore, grant the petition and quash the order of the lower court striking petitioner's demand for jury trial with directions to grant a jury trial on the factual issues presented by petitioner's complaint should the legal issues be decided in his favor.

Petition for writ of certiorari GRANTED.

CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Burk
617 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.
592 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Emiddio v. Southeast Bank, N.A.
587 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Daniel T. Kusic, P.A. v. Barnett Banks, Inc.
586 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Voort v. International Development & Holding Corp.
579 So. 2d 887 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Marshall v. Sprecher
559 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Shuffler v. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
478 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 So. 2d 590, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valiante-v-allstate-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1985.