Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brown v. Burk

Brown v. Burk

617 So. 2d 474, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5256, 1993 WL 152542
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 12, 1993
DocketNo. 93-0343
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 617 So. 2d 474 (Brown v. Burk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Burk, 617 So. 2d 474, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5256, 1993 WL 152542 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

[475]*475ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

We deny the motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc of our February 24, 1993, denial of petitioners’ request for a writ of mandamus/certiorari. See Ronbeck Construction Co. v. Savanna Club, 592 So.2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and Lindsey v. Sherman, 402 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We note conflict with Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank, 480 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), Valiante v. Allstate Insurance, 462 So.2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), and Spring v. Ronel Refining, 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

HERSEY, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. State
617 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 So. 2d 474, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5256, 1993 WL 152542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-burk-fladistctapp-1993.