Valhalla Union Free School District v. Somers Central School District
This text of 98 Misc. 2d 365 (Valhalla Union Free School District v. Somers Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s affirmative defenses granted and defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint is denied.
It is our opinion that a suit to recover the cost of tuition based on subdivision 5 of section 3202 of the Education Law is [366]*366one to "vindicate a public interest” and is, therefore, not subject to the requirements of subdivision 1 of section 3813 of said law (see Union Free School Dist. No. 6 v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, 380; Amityville Union Free School Dist. v Freeport Union Free School Dist., NYLJ, Dec. 9, 1976, p 14, col 2 [Supreme Ct, Nassau County]; Matter of Bd. of Educ., 17 Ed Dept Rep 2). We are also of the opinion that the complaint, as pleaded states a sufficient cause of action (Matter of Jeter v Ellenville Cent. School Dist., 41 NY2d 283; Matter of Brown v Union Free School Dist. No. 8, 59 AD2d 761).
Concur: Farley, P. J., Pittoni and Silberman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 Misc. 2d 365, 413 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1978 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valhalla-union-free-school-district-v-somers-central-school-district-nyappterm-1978.