Board of Education of the Katonah-Lewisboro School District v. Board of Education of the Carmel Central School District

174 A.D.2d 704, 571 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9340
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 174 A.D.2d 704 (Board of Education of the Katonah-Lewisboro School District v. Board of Education of the Carmel Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Education of the Katonah-Lewisboro School District v. Board of Education of the Carmel Central School District, 174 A.D.2d 704, 571 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

—In an action for reimbursement of tuition pursuant to Education Law § 3202, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered November 14, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[705]*705We agree with the Supreme Court that the action is one to "vindicate a public interest” and thus the plaintiff was not required to file a notice of claim within three months of the accrual of the action pursuant to Education Law § 3813 (1) (see, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v City School Dist., 59 NY2d 262; Union Free School Dist. No. 6 v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371; Valhalla Union Free School Dist. v Somers Cent. School Dist., 98 Misc 2d 365).

However, contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the public interest exception does not permit the commencement of actions against a school district after the expiration of the one-year period of limitation of Education Law § 3813 (2-b). The instant action was commenced more than one year after the period of limitation had expired. Therefore, the action was properly dismissed as time-barred. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

North Shore Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Glen Cove City Sch. Dist.
2025 NY Slip Op 01380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Eldridge v. Carmel Central School District Board of Education
82 A.D.3d 1147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
CAYUGA-ONONDAGA BD v. Sweeney
676 N.E.2d 854 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Cayuga-Onondaga Counties Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Sweeney
224 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 A.D.2d 704, 571 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-education-of-the-katonah-lewisboro-school-district-v-board-of-nyappdiv-1991.