Valeria ex rel. Yolanda v. Davis

320 F.3d 1014, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1581, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2064, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3378
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2003
DocketNo. 01-15219
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 320 F.3d 1014 (Valeria ex rel. Yolanda v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valeria ex rel. Yolanda v. Davis, 320 F.3d 1014, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1581, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2064, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3378 (9th Cir. 2003).

Opinions

Order; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Tashima votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Hug and Sedwick so recommend.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing, but a majority of the nonrecused, active judges failed to vote in favor of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valeria v. Davis
320 F.3d 1014 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
320 F.3d 1014, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1581, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2064, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valeria-ex-rel-yolanda-v-davis-ca9-2003.