Valeria ex rel. Yolanda v. Davis
320 F.3d 1014, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1581, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2064, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3378
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2003·No. No. 01-15219·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Tashima votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Hug and Sedwick so recommend.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing, but a majority of the nonrecused, active judges failed to vote in favor of rehearing en banc.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Valeria ex rel. Yolanda v. Davis, 320 F.3d 1014, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1581, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2064, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3378 (9th Cir. 2003).
320 F.3d 1014 (Valeria ex rel. Yolanda v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valeria v. Davis
320 F.3d 1014 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)