valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County. Read the opinion of the Court — 741 F.3d 1015
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 2, 2014·No. 11-16487·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGEL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA; ISAAC No. 11-16487 CASTRO-ARMENTA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.

2:08-cv-00660-

v. SRB

COUNTY OF MARICOPA; JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, MARICOPA COUNTY ORDER SHERIFF, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Defendants-Appellees.

Filed January 2, 2014

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County, (9th Cir. 2014).

valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County (valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.