valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County
This text of valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County (valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANGEL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA; ISAAC No. 11-16487 CASTRO-ARMENTA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00660- v. SRB
COUNTY OF MARICOPA; JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, MARICOPA COUNTY ORDER SHERIFF, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Defendants-Appellees.
Filed January 2, 2014
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valenzuelaarmenta-v-county-of-maricopa-county-ca9-2014.