valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County

741 F.3d 1015, 2014 WL 66924, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 2, 2014·No. 11-16487·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges MURGUIA and HURWITZ did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County, 741 F.3d 1015, 2014 WL 66924, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10 (9th Cir. 2014).

741 F.3d 1015 (valenzuela/armenta v. County of Maricopa County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Angel Lopez-Valenzuela v. County of Maricopa
770 F.3d 772 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)