Valenti v. United Hoisting Co.
265 A.D. 963, 38 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6758
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1942·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The serious injuries concededly suffered by the plaintiff which, it sufficiently appears, may result in the loss of his testimony on the trial, plaintiff’s financial condition, and other relevant factors disclosed in the record, cause us to disagree with the learned Special Term justice in his exercise of discretion. This is a case in which a preference should be granted. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Valenti v. United Hoisting Co., 265 A.D. 963, 38 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 963 (Valenti v. United Hoisting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Upfold
204 Misc. 416 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Abraskin v. Heilwell
278 A.D. 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Healy v. Healy
198 Misc. 688 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)