Valenti v. United Hoisting Co.
This text of 265 A.D. 963 (Valenti v. United Hoisting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The serious injuries concededly suffered by the plaintiff which, it sufficiently appears, may result in the loss of his testimony on the trial, plaintiff’s financial condition, and other relevant factors disclosed in the record, cause us to disagree with the learned Special Term justice in his exercise of discretion. This is a case in which a preference should be granted. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 963, 38 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valenti-v-united-hoisting-co-nyappdiv-1942.