Abraskin v. Heilwell
278 A.D. 858, 104 N.Y.S.2d 498
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 23, 1951
StatusPublished
This text of 278 A.D. 858 (Abraskin v. Heilwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Abraskin v. Heilwell, 278 A.D. 858, 104 N.Y.S.2d 498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
Opinion
Motion for a stay denied, without costs. The receipt by plaintiff of payments under the Workmen’s Compensation Law does not bar the granting of a preference if the other circumstances establish a basis therefor. (Valenti v. United Hoisting Go., 265 App. Div. 963.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Valenti v. United Hoisting Co.
265 A.D. 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 858, 104 N.Y.S.2d 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraskin-v-heilwell-nyappdiv-1951.