Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Abraskin v. Heilwell

Abraskin v. Heilwell

278 A.D. 858, 104 N.Y.S.2d 498
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1951·Published

Opinion

Motion for a stay denied, without costs. The receipt by plaintiff of payments under the Workmen’s Compensation Law does not bar the granting of a preference if the other circumstances establish a basis therefor. (Valenti v. United Hoisting Go., 265 App. Div. 963.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraskin v. Heilwell, 278 A.D. 858, 104 N.Y.S.2d 498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 858 (Abraskin v. Heilwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valenti v. United Hoisting Co.
265 A.D. 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)