Valdosta Livestock Company v. Jacob C. Williams and Bank of Washington, Washington, North Carolina

316 F.2d 188, 7 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1079, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5635
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 8, 1963·No. 8905_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to prosecute an appeal from an order of the District Court denying its motion for summary judgment on the ground that there were genuine issues as to material facts which should be tried by jury. The order is interlocutory and is, therefore, unappealable. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United States, 149 F.2d 130 (2d Cir., 1945); Burleson v. Canada, 285 F.2d 264 (4th Cir., 1961).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valdosta Livestock Company v. Jacob C. Williams and Bank of Washington, Washington, North Carolina, 316 F.2d 188, 7 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1079, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5635 (4th Cir. 1963).

316 F.2d 188 (Valdosta Livestock Company v. Jacob C. Williams and Bank of Washington, Washington, North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Sheetz, Inc.
998 F. Supp. 670 (W.D. Virginia, 1998)
Podberesky v. Kirwan
38 F.3d 147 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Smith International, Inc., Etc. v. Hughes Tool Company
759 F.2d 1572 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Hill v. Smith
248 S.E.2d 455 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior Court
330 N.E.2d 814 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New York
133 S.E.2d 770 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1963)