Valdez v. Volz

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided January 4, 2024·No. 4:23-cv-01205·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION DANIEL VALDEZ, Individually and on Behalf of Anthony Valdez; BEATRICE VALDEZ; DANIEL VALDEZ JR.; VALERIE VALDEZ; and VANESSA VALDEZ PLAINTIFFS

v. No. 4:23-cv-1205-DPM

RICHARD JAMES VOLZ and HEAVENSENT FREIGHT, LLC DEFENDANTS

ORDER Amended complaint, Doc. 3, noted. The Valdezes have not removed the jurisdiction cloud by pleading the residency of Heavensent Freight, LLC’s members. Great River Entertainment, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Co., 81 F.4th 1261, 1263 (8th Cir. 2023). The Court will not grant any injunctive relief unless and until subject matter jurisdiction is established. The Valdezes must act by 9 January 2024, as directed. Doc. 2. Motion for a temporary restraining order and expedited hearing, Doc. 4, also noted. The motion is unverified. It mentions an affidavit, but none has been filed. The Valdezes have not yet provided an adequate basis for injunctive relief. And the Court prefers to act after hearing from both sides.

Therefore, the Valdezes must file another amended complaint, supplement their motion, and file proof of good service of all those documents and this Order. Service must be expedited. Thereafter, the Court will schedule a telephone hearing if one is needed. So Ordered.

WPYGrtedl fr D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 4 Sorry Loat

he

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valdez v. Volz, (E.D. Ark. 2024).

Valdez v. Volz (Valdez v. Volz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related