Valdez v. Volz
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION DANIEL VALDEZ, Individually and on Behalf of Anthony Valdez; BEATRICE VALDEZ; DANIEL VALDEZ JR.; VALERIE VALDEZ; and VANESSA VALDEZ PLAINTIFFS
v. No. 4:23-cv-1205-DPM
RICHARD JAMES VOLZ and HEAVENSENT FREIGHT, LLC DEFENDANTS
ORDER 1. The Court notes the complaint. The Court has an independent obligation to make sure it has subject matter jurisdiction. The Valdezes must allege the residency of the members of Heavensent Freight, LLC. Great River Entertainment, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Co., 81 F.4th 1261, 1263 (8th Cir. 2023). Unless the Valdezes file a proposed amended complaint by 9 January 2024 clarifying the jurisdictional facts, the Court will dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2. The Court notes the embedded request for a temporary restraining order. The request is denied without prejudice. There must be a separate motion for injunctive relief. LOCAL RULE 7.2(e). So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 22 December 2023
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Valdez v. Volz (Valdez v. Volz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.