Valdez v. State
652 So. 2d 935, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3302, 1995 WL 136735
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Valdez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 613 So. 2d 916 →
Opinion
We affirm the imposition of restitution, but remand for a hearing to determine the amount. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993); Crosby v. State, 637 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the trial court is also directed to reconsider its cost order to conform with this court’s recent decision in Reyes v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D467,-So.2d-[1995 WL 65502] (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 15, 1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Valdez v. State, 652 So. 2d 935, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3302, 1995 WL 136735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
652 So. 2d 935 (Valdez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crosby v. State
637 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)