Valdez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Valdez v. State

652 So. 2d 935, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3302, 1995 WL 136735

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 1995

DocketNo. 93-04309

StatusPublished

This text of 652 So. 2d 935 (Valdez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valdez v. State, 652 So. 2d 935, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3302, 1995 WL 136735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the imposition of restitution, but remand for a hearing to determine the amount. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993); Crosby v. State, 637 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the trial court is also directed to reconsider its cost order to conform with this court’s recent decision in Reyes v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D467,-So.2d-[1995 WL 65502] (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 15, 1995).

FRANK, C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the imposition of restitution, but remand for a hearing to determine the amount. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993); Crosby v. State, 637 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the trial court is also directed to reconsider its cost order to conform with this court’s recent decision in Reyes v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D467,-So.2d-[1995 WL 65502] (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 15, 1995).

FRANK, C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

652 So. 2d 935, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3302, 1995 WL 136735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdez-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack