Valdez v. State
696 So. 2d 958, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8179, 1997 WL 395257
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 1997
DocketNo. 96-4942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 696 So. 2d 958 (Valdez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Valdez v. State, 696 So. 2d 958, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8179, 1997 WL 395257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
Based upon our recent decision in Richardson v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D1498, — So.2d - [1997 WL 325600] (Fla. 1st DCA June 17, 1997) (criminal division en banc), we affirm the denial of appellant’s motion seeking postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As in Richardson, we certify to the supreme court the following question:
ARE CONSECUTIVE HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDER SENTENCES FOR MULTIPLE OFFENSES ARISING FROM A SINGLE CRIMINAL EPISODE, PROSCRIBED BY HALE V. STATE, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), ILLEGAL WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 3.800(a), WHEN NO SINGLE SENTENCE EXCEEDS THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM PROVIDED BY LAW?
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Valdes v. State
765 So. 2d 774 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 958, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8179, 1997 WL 395257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valdez-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.