Valdez v. Alford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Valdez v. Alford

164 S.W.3d 2, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 176, 2005 WL 221605

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 1, 2005·No. No. ED 83826·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Valdez appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his negligence action against Gary Alford for damages [3]*3arising from two separate automobile accidents. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Valdez appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his negligence action against Gary Alford for damages [3]*3arising from two separate automobile accidents. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Valdez v. Alford, 164 S.W.3d 2, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 176, 2005 WL 221605 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

164 S.W.3d 2 (Valdez v. Alford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related