in Re Jennifer Webb-Goetz
This text of in Re Jennifer Webb-Goetz (in Re Jennifer Webb-Goetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Appellate case name: In re Jennifer Webb-Goetz, Relator
Appellate case number: 01-19-00139-CV
Trial court case number: 2010-56180
Trial court: 308th District Court of Harris County
On March 1, 2019, relator, Jennifer Webb-Goetz, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent trial judge to vacate the oral ruling striking her jury demand and to compel the respondent to place the underlying modification proceeding on the jury trial docket. Although relator included a Rule 52.3(j) certification with her appendix, she contends that the respondent has not yet signed a written order striking her jury demand. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j). Also, counsel has been unable to obtain the reporter’s record of the February 27, 2019 hearing on her jury demand, but that no evidentiary testimony was adduced at that hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1), (2). With her petition, relator filed an “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief on Petition for Writ of Mandamus” seeking to stay the underlying proceeding, pending disposition of this petition, because a bench trial has been set for March 4, 2019. Relator’s emergency motion contains the required certificate of compliance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a). Accordingly, the Court grants the relator’s motion and ORDERS that the underlying trial court proceeding is stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the petition is finally decided or this Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). Any party may file a motion for reconsideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(c). Finally, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by any real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 52.4.
It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Justice Laura C. Higley_____ x Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: ___March 1, 2019___
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jennifer Webb-Goetz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jennifer-webb-goetz-texapp-2019.