Valdes v. State

68 So. 3d 994, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14156, 2011 WL 3903116
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Valdes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15797
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 7, 2011·No. 3D11-1252·Published

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D).

Valdes claims that he was not advised by the trial court of the deportation conse *995 quences of his plea. The trial court’s order denying relief failed to address this claim. Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts 1 conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

1

. The plea colloquy, for example.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valdes v. State, 68 So. 3d 994, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14156, 2011 WL 3903116 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

68 So. 3d 994 (Valdes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. Collins
68 So. 3d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)