Valdes v. State

20 So. 3d 987, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15797, 2009 WL 3365640
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 2009·No. 3D08-939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of revocation of probation but reverse, in part, and remand. As the State commendably concedes, the written order of revocation improperly recites three reasons for revocation. However, only one reason was proven and pronounced orally by the court. The order must be corrected on remand to reflect the sole reason for which the court orally revoked probation.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valdes v. State, 20 So. 3d 987, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15797, 2009 WL 3365640 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

20 So. 3d 987 (Valdes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valdes v. State
93 So. 3d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)