Uyeda v. Schermer

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Uyeda v. Schermer. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 Haw. 163
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided April 4, 2019·No. SCWC16-0000200·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

04-APR-2019

08:05 AM

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

CAROLYN UYEDA and JAY UYEDA, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,

vs.

EVAN SCHERMER,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIVIL NO. 3SS 15-1-153K)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Motion to Reconsider filed by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Evan Schermer on March 29, 2019, the declaration of counsel and memorandum attached thereto, and the record and files herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. On remand, if the District Court of the Third Circuit makes findings of fact under Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 604-10.5, the district court may

consider Petitioner’s claims that he complied with the injunction issued January 19, 2016.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 4, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uyeda v. Schermer, (haw 2019).

Uyeda v. Schermer (Uyeda v. Schermer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.