Uyeda v. Schermer
This text of Uyeda v. Schermer (Uyeda v. Schermer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000200 23-MAY-2018 10:56 AM SCWC-16-0000200
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
CAROLYN UYEDA and JAY UYEDA, Petitioners and Respondents/Petitioners-Appellees,
vs.
EVAN SCHERMER, Respondent and Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000200; CASE NO. 3SS 15-1-153K)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Respondent and Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant Evan
Schermer’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 15,
2018, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 23, 2018.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uyeda v. Schermer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uyeda-v-schermer-haw-2018.