Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co.

1908 OK 197, 97 P. 649, 22 Okla. 263, 1908 Okla. LEXIS 26
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 16, 1908·No. 10·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hates, J.

A motion to dismiss has been filed by defendant in error in which he alleges several grounds for dismissal. One ground alleged is that no writ of error was sued out by plaintiff in error within six months from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court. Under the rule announced by this court in Edward Porter et al. v. Eck E. Brook, 21 Okla. 885. 97 Pac. 645, and in H. K. Bickford v. Stanley R. Bruce et al. 21 Okla. 892, 97 Pac. 648 the motion to dismiss in this case should be sustained upon this ground, and it is unnecessary to notice the other grounds set out in the motion.

The motion to dismiss is sustained

Williams, C. J., and Dunn, Kane and Turner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co., 1908 OK 197, 97 P. 649, 22 Okla. 263, 1908 Okla. LEXIS 26 (Okla. 1908).

1908 OK 197 (Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chouteau v. Chouteau
1910 OK 6 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)