Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co.
This text of 1908 OK 197 (Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A motion to dismiss has been filed by defendant in error in which he alleges several grounds for dismissal. One ground alleged is that no writ of error was sued out by plaintiff in error within six months from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court. Under the rule announced by this court in Edward Porter et al. v. Eck E. Brook, 21 Okla. 885. 97 Pac. 645, and in H. K. Bickford v. Stanley R. Bruce et al. 21 Okla. 892, 97 Pac. 648 the motion to dismiss in this case should be sustained upon this ground, and it is unnecessary to notice the other grounds set out in the motion.
The motion to dismiss is sustained
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1908 OK 197, 97 P. 649, 22 Okla. 263, 1908 Okla. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utterback-v-rock-island-plow-co-okla-1908.