Bickford v. Bruce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Bickford v. Bruce

1908 OK 172, 97 P. 648, 21 Okla. 892, 1908 Okla. LEXIS 185

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 10, 1908

DocketNo. 916, Ind. T.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1908 OK 172 (Bickford v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bickford v. Bruce, 1908 OK 172, 97 P. 648, 21 Okla. 892, 1908 Okla. LEXIS 185 (Okla. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Hayes, J.

A motion has been filed herein to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the writ of error was not sued out within 6 months from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court. Nearly 12 months elapsed from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court until the writ of error was sued out, and under the rule announced by this court at the present term in Edward Porter et al. v. Eck E. Brook, ante, p. 885, 97 Pac. 645, the motion should be sustained; and it is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes, J.

A motion has been filed herein to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the writ of error was not sued out within 6 months from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court. Nearly 12 months elapsed from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court until the writ of error was sued out, and under the rule announced by this court at the present term in Edward Porter et al. v. Eck E. Brook, ante, p. 885, 97 Pac. 645, the motion should be sustained; and it is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1908 OK 172, 97 P. 648, 21 Okla. 892, 1908 Okla. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bickford-v-bruce-okla-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack