Utter v. Eames
This text of 59 Cal. 5 (Utter v. Eames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was evidence in this case which tended to prove that the defendant at a certain time was indebted to the Eagle Copper and Silver Mining Company, of which the plaintiff was Secretary and Treasurer, in the sum of two thousand dollars, which the plaintiff, at the request of the defendant, paid, and took the promissory notes of the defendant, sued upon in this action therefor. If there is any evidence tending to prove the contrary, it simply constitutes a conflict in the evidence. Findings were waived, and as the judgment is in favor of the plaintiff, the presumption is that the Court found in favor of the plaintiff upon that, as well as upon every other controverted question in the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Cal. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utter-v-eames-cal-1881.