Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 672 F. App'x 1000
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 13, 2017·No. 16-1626·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant

v.

DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Appellee ______________________

2016-1626 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00725. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL, Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID S. MORELAND.

JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2017).

Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc. (Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.