Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc.
This text of Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc. (Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant
v.
DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Appellee ______________________
2016-1626 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00725. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL, Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID S. MORELAND.
JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Utility Associates, Inc. v. Digital Ally, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/utility-associates-inc-v-digital-ally-inc-cafc-2017.