Utess v. Erie Railroad
123 N.Y.S. 1146
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Utess v. Erie Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D. 447 →
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
McLENNAN, P. J., and WILLIAMS, J., dissent, upon the ground that the engineer in charge of the train was not shown guilty of negligence which caused or contributed to the injury, and that in any event the proof does not bring the case within the provisions of the Barnes act. See opinion of McLennan, P. J., in same case on former appeal, reported at 131 App. Div. 447, 115 N. Y. Supp. 389.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Utess v. Erie Railroad, 123 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
123 N.Y.S. 1146 (Utess v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Utess v. Erie Railroad
131 A.D. 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)