Utess v. Erie Railroad
140 A.D. 922
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Utess v. Erie Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D. 447 →
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground that the motion for a new trial should have been granted upon proper terms.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Utess v. Erie Railroad, 140 A.D. 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
140 A.D. 922 (Utess v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.