Uterhart v. National Bank of Far Rockaway

258 A.D. 919, 17 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7582
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Uterhart v. National Bank of Far Rockaway. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D. 859

Opinion

Plaintiff, in an action for alleged fraudulent conspiracy, appeals (a) from an order dismissing his last amended complaint, in so far as it relates to the respondent, and permitting the entry of judgment accordingly, and (b) from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uterhart v. National Bank of Far Rockaway, 258 A.D. 919, 17 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 919 (Uterhart v. National Bank of Far Rockaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.