Uterhart v. National Bank of Far Rockaway

255 A.D. 860, 7 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5673
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order granting plaintiff’s motion for examination of a witness before trial modified by striking out items (a) to (e), inclusive, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The items mentioned pertain only to hearsay testimony not material and necessary on the trial. Item (f) relates to conversations with the officers of defendant bank in which admissions pertinent to the issues may be obtained. The facts presented warranted the exercise of discretion at Special Term in granting the examination in this respect. (Bloede Co. v. Devine Co., 211 App. Div. 180; Bartlett v. Sanford, 244 id. 722.) The witness may produce his records to aid his recollection on these subjects. Settle order on notice, in which an officer will be appointed before whom the examination will be had, and a date fixed for such examination. Motion to dismiss appeal dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uterhart v. National Bank of Far Rockaway, 255 A.D. 860, 7 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 860 (Uterhart v. National Bank of Far Rockaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albero v. State
24 A.D.2d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)