Uslan v. Bowen
112 N.J.L. 98
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Uslan v. Bowen, 112 N.J.L. 98 (N.J. 1934).
112 N.J.L. 98 (Uslan v. Bowen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.