Uslan v. Bowen
169 A. 690, 112 N.J.L. 98, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 237
This text of 169 A. 690 (Uslan v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Uslan v. Bowen, 169 A. 690, 112 N.J.L. 98, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1934).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 99
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
169 A. 690, 112 N.J.L. 98, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uslan-v-bowen-nj-1934.