U.S. Dental, Inc. v. Hart Armonk Associates, L. L. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

U.S. Dental, Inc. v. Hart Armonk Associates, L. L. C.

277 A.D.2d 221, 716 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11210

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 A.D.2d 221 (U.S. Dental, Inc. v. Hart Armonk Associates, L. L. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

U.S. Dental, Inc. v. Hart Armonk Associates, L. L. C., 277 A.D.2d 221, 716 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a commercial lease, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered November 30, [222]*2221999, which denied their motion for leave to vacate an order of the same court, dated October 6, 1999, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment against them upon their default in appearing or answering.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to vacate an order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment against them upon their default in appearing or answering. The defendants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default (see, Bravo v New York City Hous. Auth., 253 AD2d 510; Swedish v Bourie, 233 AD2d 495; Miles v Blue Label Trucking, 232 AD2d 382). Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a commercial lease, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered November 30, [222]*2221999, which denied their motion for leave to vacate an order of the same court, dated October 6, 1999, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment against them upon their default in appearing or answering.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to vacate an order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment against them upon their default in appearing or answering. The defendants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default (see, Bravo v New York City Hous. Auth., 253 AD2d 510; Swedish v Bourie, 233 AD2d 495; Miles v Blue Label Trucking, 232 AD2d 382). Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 221, 716 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-dental-inc-v-hart-armonk-associates-l-l-c-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack