AIU Insurance v. Fernandez
This text of 281 A.D.2d 542 (AIU Insurance v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Jerry Fernandez appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated March 3, 2000, which denied his motion to vacate a prior order of the same court, dated September 13, 1999, grant[543]*543ing the petition and permanently staying arbitration upon his default in appearing.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To vacate the order entered upon his default in appearing in opposition to the petition to permanently stay arbitration, the appellant was obligated to establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious defense (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Presbyterian Hosp. v New York Cent. Mut. Ins. Co., 277 AD2d 299; McGee v McAleer, 277 AD2d 207). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion, as he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default (see, McGee v McAleer, supra; U.S. Dental v Hart Armonk Assocs., 277 AD2d 221; Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v Matteo, 271 AD2d 422). In light of this conclusion, we need not consider whether the appellant established the existence of a meritorious defense (see, Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v Matteo, supra). Bracken, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D.2d 542, 721 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiu-insurance-v-fernandez-nyappdiv-2001.