U.S. Bank Natl. Ass'n v. Gullotta
This text of 872 N.E.2d 948 (U.S. Bank Natl. Ass'n v. Gullotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stark App. No. 2006CA00145, 2007-Ohio-2085. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry file June 6, 2007:
“Whether or not each missed payment under a promissory note and mortgage yields a new claim such that any successive actions on the same note and mortgage involve different claims and are thus exempt from the ‘two-dismissal rule’ contained in Civ.R. 41(A)(1).”
The conflict case is EMC Mtge. Corp. v. Jenkins, 164 Ohio App.3d 240, 2005-Ohio-5799.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
872 N.E.2d 948, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-natl-assn-v-gullotta-ohio-2007.