Urcuyo v. Urcuyo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Urcuyo v. Urcuyo

444 So. 2d 1027, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11402

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1479

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 So. 2d 1027 (Urcuyo v. Urcuyo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Urcuyo v. Urcuyo, 444 So. 2d 1027, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11402 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order under review on the sole basis that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing this action between non-residents without prejudice to the appellant’s right to reinstate the action in a more convenient forum. We do not pass upon the other grounds for dismissal of the complaint or any count thereof recited in the trial court’s order, since we are of the view that these grounds, if renewed, must be resolved by the ultimate forum court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order under review on the sole basis that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing this action between non-residents without prejudice to the appellant’s right to reinstate the action in a more convenient forum. We do not pass upon the other grounds for dismissal of the complaint or any count thereof recited in the trial court’s order, since we are of the view that these grounds, if renewed, must be resolved by the ultimate forum court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 So. 2d 1027, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urcuyo-v-urcuyo-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack