Urcuyo v. Urcuyo
444 So. 2d 1027, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11402
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 1984·No. No. 83-1479·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order under review on the sole basis that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing this action between non-residents without prejudice to the appellant’s right to reinstate the action in a more convenient forum. We do not pass upon the other grounds for dismissal of the complaint or any count thereof recited in the trial court’s order, since we are of the view that these grounds, if renewed, must be resolved by the ultimate forum court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Urcuyo v. Urcuyo, 444 So. 2d 1027, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11402 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
444 So. 2d 1027 (Urcuyo v. Urcuyo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Levey v. Getelman
444 So. 2d 1027 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)