Levey v. Getelman
This text of 444 So. 2d 1027 (Levey v. Getelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Burton R. LEVEY, Appellant,
v.
Michael J. GETELMAN, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Richman, Greer, Weil & Zack; Ellen C. Freidin, Miami, for appellant.
Lapidus & Stettin, and Herbert Stettin, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
*1028 PER CURIAM.
The first appearance of this case before the court resulted in reversal of a summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellee-defendant. Levey v. Getelman, 408 So.2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The present appeal is from a final judgment entered on an order granting appellee's motion for a directed verdict made at the end of appellant-plaintiff's case. Again, we reverse.
On examination of the record we find that sufficient evidence was presented to raise a jury question on the issues of material fraud and damages. Where evidence is conflicting, or will admit of different reasonable inferences, the issue should be submitted to the jury as a question of fact, and not passed upon by the judge as a matter of law. Hendricks v. Dailey, 208 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1968); Behar v. Root, 393 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 So. 2d 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levey-v-getelman-fladistctapp-1984.