Urbanski v. Blum

75 A.D.2d 1023

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Sehimmel v Reed, 50 AD2d 1085, affd 40 NY2d 887; Matter of Barton v Lavine, 54 AD2d 350). (Appeals from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court— CPLR art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Urbanski v. Blum, 75 A.D.2d 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

75 A.D.2d 1023 (Urbanski v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schimmel v. Reed
357 N.E.2d 1016 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Schimmel v. Reed
50 A.D.2d 1085 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Barton v. Lavine
54 A.D.2d 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)