Schimmel v. Reed

357 N.E.2d 1016, 40 N.Y.2d 887, 389 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3062
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1976·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (50 AD2d 1085). (See, also, Matter of Martin v Lavine, 39 NY2d 72.)

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schimmel v. Reed, 357 N.E.2d 1016, 40 N.Y.2d 887, 389 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3062 (N.Y. 1976).

357 N.E.2d 1016 (Schimmel v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pena v. Dowling
229 A.D.2d 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Rice v. Perales
156 Misc. 2d 631 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Corrigan v. Affleck
523 F. Supp. 498 (D. Rhode Island, 1981)
Burton v. Department of Health & Social Services of State
309 N.W.2d 388 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1981)
Calkins v. Blum
511 F. Supp. 1073 (N.D. New York, 1981)
Phillips v. Russo
81 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Urbanski v. Blum
75 A.D.2d 1023 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Leone v. Blum
73 A.D.2d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Reeves v. Fahey
65 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Barton v. Lavine
54 A.D.2d 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)