Urban v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc.
This text of 398 F.3d 699 (Urban v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER ON REHEARING
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court, having considered the request for rehearing, amicus brief, and response, clarifies the panel opinion as follows.
The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Urban, reasoning that Dollar General was required to notify Urban pursuant to the cure provision in 29 C.F.R. § 825.305(d). Urban v. Dolgencorp of Tex., Inc., 2003 WL 21804916, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15334 (N.D.Tex. Aug. 6, 2003). This Court, interpreting § 825.305(d), found that a nonexistent medical certification is not an “incomplete” certification for purposes of that subsection. Urban v. Dolgencorp of Tex., Inc., 393 F.3d 572 (5th Cir.2004). We hereby clarify that we REVERSE the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment as to Urban’s 29 C.F.R. § 825.305(d) claim, and REMAND this case to the district court for further pro *700 ceedings not inconsistent with our decision interpreting § 825.305(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
398 F.3d 699, 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 499, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1339, 2005 WL 174646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urban-v-dolgencorp-of-texas-inc-ca5-2005.