Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports·Decided August 7, 1986·No. 86-201·Published

Opinion

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California

JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP Attorney General

_________________________

: OPINION : No. 86-201 : of : AUGUST 7, 1986 : JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP : Attorney General : : RODNEY O. LILYQUIST : Deputy Attorney General : :

________________________________________________________________________

THE HONORABLE NOLAN FRIZZELLE, MEMBER, CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following questions:

1. Is an employee of a local public agency who is a member of the State Military Reserve entitled to a temporary leave of absence from his employment to attend active and inactive reserve activities?

2. Under what circumstances, if any, may a member of the State Military Reserve be ordered to active duty?

3. What employment rights to salary and length of leave, if any, does an employee of a local public agency have who is ordered to active duty as a member of the State Military Reserve?

1 86-201 CONCLUSIONS

1. An employee of a local public agency who is a member of the State Military Reserve is entitled to a temporary leave of absence from his employment to attend active, but not inactive, reserve activities.

2. A member of the State Military Reserve may be ordered to active duty during times of war, rebellion, insurrection, riot, public calamity or catastrophe and other emergencies as set forth in Military and Veterans Code sections 142, 143, and 146.

3. An employee of a local public agency who is ordered to active duty as a member of the State Military Reserve is entitled to leave with pay for not more than 30 calendar days from his employer and a leave of absence for the duration of the duty as specified in Military and Veterans Code section 395.05.

ANALYSIS

The State Military Reserve ("Reserve") is part of the Military Department, along with the California National Guard, the Naval Militia, the California Cadet Corps, and the Office of Adjutant General. (Mil. & Vet. Code, § 51.)1 The Reserve, the National Guard, and the Naval Militia constitute the active militia of the state. (§ 120.)

The Reserve is a voluntary organization under the authority and control of the Governor. (See §§ 550, 551.) It is available "to assume the duties and functions of the National Guard within the state whenever the National Guard is called into federal service" and "to respond immediately whenever called in any natural disaster or civil emergency to protect and preserve the lives and property of the citizens of the state." (Stats. 1984, ch. 1545, § 1.)2

1 All references hereafter to the Military and Veterans Code are by section number only. 2 Use of the Reserve for these purposes has the consent of Congress. Clause 3 of section 10 of article I of the United States Constitution provides: "No State shall, without the consent of Congress, . . . keep troops or ships of war in time of peace . . . ." Section 109 of title 32 of the United States Code states: "(a) In time of peace, a State or Territory, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Canal Zone, or District of Columbia may maintain no troops other than those of its National Guard and defense forces authorized by subsection (c). "(b) Nothing in this title limits the right of a State or Territory, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Canal Zone, or the District of Columbia to use its National Guard or its defense forces authorized by subsection (c) within its

2 86-201 1. Temporary Leave of Absence

The first question to be resolved is whether an employee of a local public agency who is a member of the Reserve is entitled to a temporary leave of absence from 3

his employer in order to attend active and inactive Reserve activities.4 We conclude that he is so entitled only with respect to active Reserve activities.

Subdivision (a) of section 389 states:

"As used in this chapter, 'temporary military leave of absence' means a leave of absence from public employment to engage in ordered military duty for a period which by the order is not to exceed 180 calendar days including travel time for purposes of active military training, encampment, naval cruises, special exercises or like activity as a member of the reserve

borders in time of peace, or prevents it from organizing and maintaining police or constabulary. "(c) In addition to its National Guard, if any, a State or Territory, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Canal Zone, or the District of Columbia may, as provided by its laws, organize and maintain defense forces. A defense force established under this section may be used within the jurisdiction concerned, as its chief executive (or commanding general in the case of the District of Columbia) considers necessary, but it may not be called, ordered, or drafted into the armed forces. "(d) A member of a defense force established under subsection (c) is not, because of that membership, exempt from service in the armed forces, nor is he entitled to pay, allowances, subsistence, transportation, or medical care or treatment, from funds of the United States. "(e) A person may not become a member of a defense force established under subsection (c) if he is a member of a reserve component of the armed forces." 3 A local public agency would be a "county, city and county, city, municipal corporation, school district, irrigation district, water district, or other district." (§ 389, subd. (c).) Civil service employees of the state are covered by a separate statutory scheme, Government Code sections 19770-19786; the employment benefits for military service are similar for the two groups. (Bowers v. City of San Buenaventura (1977) 75 Cal.App.3d 65, 71-72.) 4 An "active" Reserve activity for our purposes means the 15-day annual summer camp or more extensive training activities, while an "inactive" Reserve activity would be the usual monthly weekend drills. (See §§ 389, 395; Bowers v. City of Buenaventura, supra, 75 Cal.App.3d 65, 73-75; 63 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 483, 485-486 (1980).) The latter are now called "unit training assemblies."

3 86-201 corps or force of the armed forces of the United States, or the National Guard, or the Naval Militia." (Emphasis added.)

This definition is made expressly applicable to Reserve members by section 566.5

Section 395 provides in part:

"Any public employee who is a member of the reserve corps of the armed forces of the United States or of the National Guard or the Naval Militia shall be entitled to a temporary military leave of absence as provided by federal law while engaged in military duty ordered for purposes of active military training, encampment, naval cruises, special exercises or like activity as such member, providing that the period of ordered duty does not exceed 180 calendar days including time involved in going to and returning from such duty, and provided that paid military leave of absence is not required for periods of inactive military duty." (Emphases added.)

Section 395 is made expressly applicable to Reserve members while they are in active service.6

The provisions of sections 389 and 395 were examined in Bowers v. City of San Buenaventura, supra, 75 Cal.App.3d at pages 73-75. Based upon the legislative histories of the two statutes, the court concluded that while "public employees must use their own time to attend . . . weekend drills" (p. 73), they are entitled to a temporary leave of absence from their employers for "more extensive training activity such as camp" (p. 75).

In 63 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, (Cal. 1986).

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion (Untitled California Attorney General Opinion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Riley
123 P.2d 488 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Los Angeles Fire & Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles
23 Cal. App. 3d 67 (California Court of Appeal, 1972)
Bowers v. City of San Buenaventura
75 Cal. App. 3d 65 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)