Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 13026
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 15, 2015·No. 01-15-00266-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 01-15-00266-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/15/2015 10:06:33 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/15/2015 10:06:33 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that on September 3, 2015, I conferred with Mark A. Giugliano, counsel for Appellant, regarding the relief requested in this Motion, and that Mr. Giugliano stated that Appellant is unopposed to the relief sought herein.

/s/ Michael V. Powell Michael V. Powell Resident Attorney for Appellees

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 15th day of September, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served via eFile Texas on Appellant through its counsel of record, listed below:

Mark A. Giugliano Gibbs & Bruns LLP 1100 Louisiana, Suite 5300 Houston, Texas 77002-5215 Counsel for Appellant

/s/ Michael V. Powell Michael V. Powell Resident Attorney for Appellees

LARA E. ROMANSIC’S MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PAGE 5 Board of Law Examiners Appointed by the Supreme Court of Texas P.O. Box 13486 * Austin, Texas 78711-3486

Acknowledgment Letter Non-Resident Attorney Fee

July 23, 2015

To: Lara E. Romansic Via: Lromansic@steptoe.com

According to Texas Government Code §82.0361, “a nonresident attorney requesting permission to participate in proceedings in a court in this state shall pay a fee of $250 for each case in which the attorney is requesting to participate.”

This Acknowledgement Letter serves as proof that the Board of Law Examiners has received $250 in connection with the following matter:

Non-resident attorney: Lara Elizabeth Romansic Case: 01-15-00266-CV Texas court or body: Court of Appeals for the First Court of Appeals District of Texas After satisfying the fee requirement, a non-resident attorney shall file a motion in the Texas court or body in which the non-resident attorney is requesting permission to appear. The motion shall contain the information and statements required by Rule XIX(a) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Texas. The motion must be accompanied by this Acknowledgment Letter and by a motion from a resident practicing Texas attorney that contains the statements required by Rule XIX(b).

The decision to grant or deny a non-resident attorney’s motion for permission to participate in the proceedings in a particular cause is made by the Texas court or body in which it is filed.

For more information, please see Rule XIX of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Texas and §82.0361 of the Texas Government Code, which can be found on the Board’s website.

Sincerely,

Susan Henricks Executive Director

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. (Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 82.0361
Texas GV § 82.0361