Unlandherm v. Park Contracting Corp.

S.D. New York

Unlandherm v. Park Contracting Corp.

1 F.R.D. 122, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1862

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 F.R.D. 122 (Unlandherm v. Park Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Unlandherm v. Park Contracting Corp., 1 F.R.D. 122, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1862 (S.D.N.Y. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

BONDY, District Judge.

A request for admissions pursuant to Rule 36, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, is not subject to a motion to strike. Nekrasoff v. United States Rubber Co., D.C., 27 F. Supp. 953; Modern Food Process Co., Inc., v. Chester Packing & Provision Co., Inc., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 520. See Moore, Federal Practice, pp. 2660, 2661; cf. Banca Nazionale Di Credito v. Equitable Trust Co., 221 App.Div. 555, 224 N.Y.S. 617.

It may be noted, however, contrary to the defendant’s contention, that it has been held that the word “therein” as used in Rule 36 is not limited to facts contained in documents, but includes all facts relevant to the pleadings and set forth in the re[123]*123quest. Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co., D. C., 26 F.Supp. 566; McCrate v. Morgan Packing Co., D.C., 26 F.Supp. 812; see Moore, Federal Practice, pp. 2652, 2653.

The motion accordingly is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BONDY, District Judge.

A request for admissions pursuant to Rule 36, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, is not subject to a motion to strike. Nekrasoff v. United States Rubber Co., D.C., 27 F. Supp. 953; Modern Food Process Co., Inc., v. Chester Packing & Provision Co., Inc., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 520. See Moore, Federal Practice, pp. 2660, 2661; cf. Banca Nazionale Di Credito v. Equitable Trust Co., 221 App.Div. 555, 224 N.Y.S. 617.

It may be noted, however, contrary to the defendant’s contention, that it has been held that the word “therein” as used in Rule 36 is not limited to facts contained in documents, but includes all facts relevant to the pleadings and set forth in the re[123]*123quest. Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co., D. C., 26 F.Supp. 566; McCrate v. Morgan Packing Co., D.C., 26 F.Supp. 812; see Moore, Federal Practice, pp. 2652, 2653.

The motion accordingly is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 F.R.D. 122, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unlandherm-v-park-contracting-corp-nysd-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack